Artificial Intelligence is fast integrating into healthcare and changing clinical practices, offering decision support and diagnostic precision previously unimagined. However, as identified in the narrative review by Victoria Tucci et al. in the Journal of Medical Artificial Intelligence, 2022, trust remains a critical barrier to the widespread adoption of medical AI by healthcare professionals.

Key Determinants of Trust in Medical AI

The review identifies various factors that influence trust in medical AI, broadly categorized as qualitative and quantitative considerations. Among them, the most salient aspects are:

Explainability and Transparency: The most discussed factor, explainability refers to the degree of an AI system that is able to explain the reason behind its recommendations. Healthcare providers need to understand how the decisions are derived in order to determine if those decisions are valid. The transparency enhances this by placing importance on the need for AI systems to show the data and methods on which their functions are based. It helps build trust in the model on its relevance and applicability to specific patient populations.

Education and Usability: Education provides a foundation for the HCPs to understand how AI works, increasing their confidence in using such systems. Several studies have shown that formal training in AI during medical education increases trust in AI. Usability involves designing user-centered interfaces, aligning with the clinical workflow to minimize cognitive load and reduce barriers to adoption.

Reliability and Accuracy: The consistent performance of AI systems under varied conditions or reliability or correctness of output is what is most important for clinicians in trusting the tool, especially in a high stake environment.

Fairness and Robustness: Fairness involves the absence of any prejudice within AI algorithms. These shall treat all demographic groups rather equally. Robustness concerns the manner in which AI systems shall be expected to perform, always dependably, when faced with any new or incomplete data input-something central to maintaining trusting relationships in the long run.

Challenges to Adoption

Despite its promise, it faces many barriers to implementation, each of which, again, relates to some aspect of trust dynamics: the black box nature wherein most AI systems come as “black boxes” that really do not allow the inner mechanisms of their work to be understood; the “black box” phenomenon undermines the clinicians’ confidence in them; biases and discrimination, unless the training is done on representative datasets, there is a very good chance that the AI itself will promote systemic biases or raise ethical concerns; Workflow Disruptions: Poorly integrated AI systems sometimes impede, rather than enhance, clinical workflows.

Engineering Insights and Cross-Disciplinary Learnings

The review draws parallels from the engineering to the medical fields in respect of trust-building. Interpretabilities, accountability, and predictability of concepts stand as shared priorities. However, their application does take a different shape: whereas in engineering, interpretability often refers to granular visibility of algorithmic processes, in medicine, it is about practical insights which directly inform clinical decisions.

Strategies to Enhance Trust Overcoming this trust deficit requires a multidimensional approach by developers and policymakers alike. 

Engage End-Users Early: Involving clinicians in both design and testing phases guarantees that AI systems address real-world clinical problems. 

Regulatory Standards: Availing frameworks such as CONSORT-AI ensures that AI systems are put through rigorous assessment, thereby enhancing credibility. 

Continuous Feedback Mechanisms: Setting up iterative feedback loops between developers and end-users allows the refining of AI systems in light of real-world experience.

The Road Ahead

As AI continues to evolve, it is optimal trust-a point of equilibria whereby users trust AI enough to be reliant on it yet remain critical of its outputs-should be aimed at. It means a balance between algorithmic complexity and explainability so that systems can be advanced yet accessible, and research on underrepresented factors of trust, such as ethicality and data discoverability, provides a holistic view of the dynamics of trust. 

Final Words

Trust in medical AI is not a technical but a collaborative challenge that requires the active involvement of engineers, clinicians, and ethicists. By addressing the different trust determinants, such as explainability, usability, and fairness, AI will evolve from a promising innovation to a trusted partner in healthcare. This is an important step in realizing the full potential of AI to improve patient outcomes while preserving the pivotal role of the clinician in the care continuum.

Dr. Prahlada N.B
MBBS (JJMMC), MS (PGIMER, Chandigarh). 
MBA in Healthcare & Hospital Management (BITS, Pilani), 
Postgraduate Certificate in Technology Leadership and Innovation (MIT, USA)
Executive Programme in Strategic Management (IIM, Lucknow)
Senior Management Programme in Healthcare Management (IIM, Kozhikode)
Advanced Certificate in AI for Digital Health and Imaging Program (IISc, Bengaluru). 

Senior Professor and former Head, 
Department of ENT-Head & Neck Surgery, Skull Base Surgery, Cochlear Implant Surgery. 
Basaveshwara Medical College & Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India. 

My Vision: I don’t want to be a genius.  I want to be a person with a bundle of experience. 

My Mission: Help others achieve their life’s objectives in my presence or absence!

My Values:  Creating value for others. 

Leave a reply